Optimality Guarantees for Particle Belief Approximation of POMDPs (Abstract Reprint)
Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Journal Track. Pages 8481-8481.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/953
Keywords
- Journal Track: Journal Track
Abstract
Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a flexible representation for real-world decision and control problems. However, POMDPs are notoriously difficult to solve, especially when the state and observation spaces are continuous or hybrid, which is often the case for physical systems. While recent online sampling-based POMDP algorithms that plan with observation likelihood weighting have shown practical effectiveness, a general theory characterizing the approximation error of the particle filtering techniques that these algorithms use has not previously been proposed. Our main contribution is bounding the error between any POMDP and its corresponding finite sample particle belief MDP (PB-MDP) approximation. This fundamental bridge between PB-MDPs and POMDPs allows us to adapt any sampling-based MDP algorithm to a POMDP by solving the corresponding particle belief MDP, thereby extending the convergence guarantees of the MDP algorithm to the POMDP. Practically, this is implemented by using the particle filter belief transition model as the generative model for the MDP solver. While this requires access to the observation density model from the POMDP, it only increases the transition sampling complexity of the MDP solver by a factor of O(C), where C is the number of particles. Thus, when combined with sparse sampling MDP algorithms, this approach can yield algorithms for POMDPs that have no direct theoretical dependence on the size of the state and observation spaces. In addition to our theoretical contribution, we perform five numerical experiments on benchmark POMDPs to demonstrate that a simple MDP algorithm adapted using PB-MDP approximation, Sparse-PFT, achieves performance competitive with other leading continuous observation POMDP solvers.
- [Lim et al., 2023] Michael H. Lim, Tyler J. Becker, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Claire J. Tomlin, and Zachary N. Sunberg. Optimality guarantees for particle belief approximation of pomdps. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 77:1591-1636, 2023.
References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.
Full text extracted automatically from the PDF; figures, tables and equations may differ. The PDF is the version of record.
Optimality Guarantees for Particle Belief Approximation of POMDPs (Abstract Reprint)
Michael Lim1 , Tyler Becker2 , Mykel Kochenderfer3 , Claire Tomlin1 and Zachary Sunberg2
1University of California, Berkeley,Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Department 2University of Colorado Boulder,Aerospace Engineering Sciences Department 3Stanford University,Aeronautics and Astronautics Department
michaelhlim@berkeley.edu, tyler.becker-1@colorado.edu, mikel@stanford.edu, tomlin@EECS.berkeley.edu, zachary.sunberg@colorado.edu
Abstract Reprint. This is an abstract reprint of a journal by [Lim et al., 2023].
Abstract
Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) provide a flexible representation for real-world decision and control problems. However, POMDPs are notoriously difficult to solve, especially when the state and observation spaces are continuous or hybrid, which is often the case for phys-
algorithms that plan with observation likelihood weighting have shown practical effectiveness, a general theory characterizing the approximation error of the particle filtering techniques that these algorithms use has not previously been proposed. Our main contribution is bounding the error between any POMDP and its corresponding finite sample particle belief MDP (PB-MDP) approximation. This fundamental bridge between PB-MDPs and POMDPs allows us to adapt any sampling-based MDP algorithm to a POMDP by solving the corresponding particle belief MDP, thereby extending the convergence guarantees of the MDP algorithm to the POMDP. Practically, this is implemented by using the particle filter belief transition model as the generative model for the MDP solver. While this requires access to the observation density model from the POMDP, it only increases the transition sampling complexity of the MDP solver by a factor of O(C), where C is the number of particles. Thus, when combined with sparse sampling MDP algorithms, this approach can yield algorithms for POMDPs that have no direct theoretical dependence on the size of the state and observation spaces. In addition to our theoretical contribution, we perform five numerical experiments on benchmark POMDPs to demonstrate that a simple MDP algorithm adapted using PB-MDP approximation, Sparse-PFT, achieves performance competitive with other leading continuous observation POMDP solvers.
@inproceedings{ijcai2024p953,
title = {Optimality Guarantees for Particle Belief Approximation of POMDPs (Abstract Reprint)},
author = {Lim, Michael and Becker, Tyler and Kochenderfer, Mykel and Tomlin, Claire and Sunberg, Zachary},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI-24}},
publisher = {International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization},
editor = {Kate Larson},
pages = {8481--8481},
year = {2024},
month = {8},
note = {Journal Track},
doi = {10.24963/ijcai.2024/953},
url = {https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/953},
}
TY - CPAPER TI - Optimality Guarantees for Particle Belief Approximation of POMDPs (Abstract Reprint) AU - Lim, Michael AU - Becker, Tyler AU - Kochenderfer, Mykel AU - Tomlin, Claire AU - Sunberg, Zachary T2 - Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24 PB - International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization PY - 2024 SP - 8481 EP - 8481 DO - 10.24963/ijcai.2024/953 UR - https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/953 ER -Copied
Machine-readable versions of this paper, for tools and AI agents:
Welcome
Future Conferences
AI Journal Division
IJCAI Proceedings
About IJCAI
IJCAI Awards