Proceedings

MFMSRNet: An Interpretable Multi-frequency and Multi-scale Riemannian Network for Motor Imagery Decoding

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 3664-3672.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/408

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) electroencephalography (EEG) decoding has benefited from deep learning, yet methods operate in Euclidean space and behave as opaque black boxes, neglecting the intrinsic geometry of functional brain connectivity. EEG connectivity descriptors, such as phase synchrony and covariance matrices, naturally reside on the manifold of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices, where Euclidean operations are geometrically inconsistent and hinder interpretability. This work proposes the Multi-frequency and Multi-scale Riemannian Network (MFMSRNet), an interpretable end-to-end geometry-aware framework for MI EEG decoding on the SPD manifold. The method constructs kernelized phase-locking value (KPLV) functional connectivity (FC) matrices to capture nonlinear phase synchrony while ensuring positive definiteness. An attention-based Riemannian fusion mechanism adaptively integrates information across multiple frequency bands in the tangent space. Furthermore, a multi-scale Riemannian network extracts global, hemispheric, and local connectivity patterns via manifold-preserving bilinear mappings and smooth eigenvalue rectification. Extensive experiments indicate that MFMSRNet yields more expressive and interpretable representations for robust MI decoding, offering a promising solution for reliable brain–computer interface applications. The code is available at https://github.com/Raeno-Rao/MFMSRNet.

  1. [Ajmeria et al., 2022] Rahul Ajmeria, Mayukh Mondal, Reya Banerjee, Tamesh Halder, Pallav Kumar Deb, Debasish Mishra, Pravanjan Nayak, Sudip Misra, Surjya Kanta Pal, and Debashish Chakravarty. A critical survey of EEG-based BCI systems for applications in industrial internet of things. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(1):184-212, 2022.
  2. [Altaheri et al., 2022] Hamdi Altaheri, Ghulam Muhammad, and Mansour Alsulaiman. Physics-informed attention tem- poral convolutional network for EEG-based motor imagery classification. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(2):2249-2258, 2022.
  3. [Altaheri et al., 2023] Hadeer Altaheri, Ghulam Muhammad, Mansour Alsulaiman, et al. Deep learning techniques for classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) motor im- agery (MI) signals: a review. Neural Computing and Appli- cations, 35:14681-14722, 2023.
  4. [Atz et al., 2021] Kenneth Atz, Francesca Grisoni, and Gis- bert Schneider. Geometric deep learning on molecular rep- resentations. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3:1023-1032, 2021.
  5. [Bassett and Bullmore, 2017] Danielle S. Bassett and Ed- ward T. Bullmore. Small-world brain networks revisited. The Neuroscientist, 23(5):499-516, 2017.
  6. [Bronstein et al., 2017] Michael M Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Yann LeCun, Arthur Szlam, and Pierre Vandergheynst. Ge- ometric deep learning: Going beyond euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(4):18-42, 2017.
  7. [Dai et al., 2019] Mengyu Dai, Zhengwu Zhang, and Anuj Srivastava. Analyzing dynamical brain functional connec- tivity as trajectories on space of covariance matrices. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 39(3):611-620, 2019.
  8. [Dan et al., 2022] Tianping Dan, Zhaohua Huang, Hongmin Cai, Paul J Laurienti, and Guorong Wu. Learning brain dynamics of evolving manifold functional mri data using geometric-attention neural network. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 41(10):2825-2836, 2022.
  9. [Dissanayake et al., 2022] Tharindu Dissanayake, Tharindu Fernando, Simon Denman, Sridha Sridharan, and Clinton Fookes. Geometric deep learning for subject independent epileptic seizure prediction using scalp EEG signals. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 26(2):527- 538, 2022.
  10. [Fei et al., 2025] Yanhong Fei, Yingjie Liu, Chentao Jia, Zhengyu Li, Xian Wei, and Mingsong Chen. A survey of geometric optimization for deep learning: From euclidean space to riemannian manifold. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(5):1-37, 2025.
  11. [Fu et al., 2025] Rongrong Fu, Linmeng Shen, Bin Lu, Mengpu Cai, Guilin Wen, Junxiang Chen, and Chengcheng Hua. A convolutional transformer network with adaptation learning modules for enhancing motor imagery classifica- tion. Expert Systems with Applications, 269:126381, 2025.
  12. [Gallego-Molina et al., 2022] Nicolás J Gallego-Molina, Andrés Ortiz, Francisco J Martínez-Murcia, Marco A Formoso, and Almudena Giménez. Complex network modeling of EEG band coupling in dyslexia: An ex- ploratory analysis of auditory processing and diagnosis. Knowledge-based Systems, 240:108098, 2022.
  13. [Gerken et al., 2023] Jan E. Gerken, Jimmy Aronsson, Oscar Carlsson, Hampus Linander, Fredrik Ohlsson, Christoffer Petersson, and Daniel Persson. Geometric deep learning and equivariant neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12):14605-14662, 2023.
  14. [He and Wu, 2020] He He and Dongrui Wu. Transfer learn- ing for brain-computer interfaces: A euclidean space data alignment approach. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 67(2):399-410, 2020.
  15. [Hu et al., 2025] Chen Hu, Rui Wang, Xiaoning Song, Tao Zhou, Xiao-Jun Wu, Nicu Sebe, and Ziheng Chen. A correlation manifold self-attention network for EEG de- coding. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 5372-5380, 2025. IJCAI
  16. [Ju and Guan, 2022] Ce Ju and Cuntai Guan. Tensor-cspnet: A novel geometric deep learning framework for motor im- agery classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Net- works and Learning Systems, 34(12):10955-10969, 2022.
  17. [Ju and Guan, 2024] Ce Ju and Cuntai Guan. Graph neural networks on SPD manifolds for motor imagery classifica- tion: A perspective from the time-frequency analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(12):17701-17715, 2024.
  18. [Kalaganis et al., 2022] Fotis P Kalaganis, Nikos A Laskaris, Vangelis P Oikonomou, Spiros Nikopolopoulos, and Ioan- nis Kompatsiaris. Revisiting riemannian geometry-based EEG decoding through approximate joint diagonalization. Journal of Neural Engineering, 19(6):066030, 2022.
  19. [Lawhern et al., 2018] Vernon J. Lawhern, Amelia J. Solon, Nicholas R. Waytowich, Stephen M. Gordon, Chou P. Hung, and Brent J. Lance. EEGNet: A compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15(5):056013, 2018.
  20. [Liu et al., 2016] Chuanwei Liu, Yunfa Fu, Jun Yang, Xin Xiong, Huiwen Sun, and Zhengtao Yu. Discrimination of motor imagery patterns by electroencephalogram phase synchronization combined with frequency band energy. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 4(3):551-557, 2016.
  21. [Liu et al., 2025] Yuan Liu, Zhuolan Gui, De Yan, Zhuang Wang, Ruisi Gao, Ningxin Han, Junying Chen, Jialing Wu, and Dong Ming. Lower limb motor imagery EEG dataset based on the multi-paradigm and longitudinal-training of stroke patients. Scientific Data, 12(1):314, 2025.
  22. [Mane et al., 2020] Ravikiran Mane, Neethu Robinson, A. Prasad Vinod, Seong-Whan Lee, and Cuntai Guan. A multi-view CNN with novel variance layer for motor im- agery brain computer interface. In The 42nd Annual Inter- national Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pages 2950-2953, 2020.
  23. [Neyland et al., 2021] Blake R Neyland, Christina E Hugen- schmidt, Robert G Lyday, Jonathan H Burdette, Laura D Baker, W Jack Rejeski, Michael E Miller, Stephen B Kritchevsky, and Paul J Laurienti. Effects of a motor im- agery task on functional brain network community structure in older adults: Data from the brain networks and mobility function (B-NET) study. Brain Sciences, 11(1):118, 2021.
  24. [Paillard et al., 2025] Joseph Paillard, Jörg F. Hipp, and De- nis A. Engemann. Green: A lightweight architecture using learnable wavelets and riemannian geometry for biomarker exploration with EEG signals. Patterns, 6(3):101182, 2025.
  25. [Pan et al., 2025] Lincong Pan, Kun Wang, Yongzhi Huang, Xinwei Sun, Jiayuan Meng, Weibo Yi, Minpeng Xu, Tzyy- Ping Jung, and Dong Ming. Enhancing motor imagery EEG classification with a riemannian geometry-based spatial filtering (RSF) method. Neural Networks, 188:107511, 2025.
  26. [Qin et al., 2024] Yiyang Qin, Banghua Yang, Sixiong Ke, Peng Liu, Fenqi Rong, and Xinxing Xia. M-FANet: Multi- feature attention convolutional neural network for motor imagery decoding. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 32:401-411, 2024.
  27. [Rudin and Cynthia, 2019] Rudin and Cynthia. Stop explain- ing black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5):206-215, 2019.
  28. [Shi et al., 2025] Yuxuan Shi, Aimin Jiang, Ju Zhong, Min Li, and Yanping Zhu. Multiclass classification frame- work of motor imagery EEG by riemannian geometry net- works. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 29(2):935-947, 2025.
  29. [Song et al., 2022] Yonghao Song, Qingqing Zheng, Bingchuan Liu, and Xiaorong Gao. EEG conformer: Con- volutional transformer for EEG decoding and visualization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31:710-719, 2022.
  30. [Su et al., 2025] Haolong Su, Gege Zhan, Yifang Lin, Lu Wang, Jie Jia, Lihua Zhang, Zhongxue Gan, and Xi- aoyang Kang. Analysis of brain network differences in the active, motor imagery, and passive stoke rehabilitation paradigms based on the task-state EEG. Brain Research, 1846:149261, 2025.
  31. [Suh and Hyung, 2021] Kim Suh, Yoon-Je and Byung Hyung. Riemannian embedding banks for common spatial patterns with EEG-based SPD neural networks. IEEE Transac- tions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29:1107-1116, 2021.
  32. [Tanamachi et al., 2023] Kenya Tanamachi, Wataru Kuwa- hara, Megumi Okawada, Shun Sasaki, and Fuminari Kaneko. Relationship between resting-state functional con- nectivity and change in motor function after motor imagery intervention in patients with stroke: A scoping review. Jour- nal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 20(1):159, 2023.
  33. [Tangermann et al., 2012] Michael Tangermann, Klaus- Robert Müller, Ad Aertsen, Niels Birbaumer, Christoph Braun, Clemens Brunner, Robert Leeb, Carsten Mehring, Kai J Miller, Gernot R Müller-Putz, et al. Review of the BCI competition IV. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6:55, 2012.
  34. [Tibermacine et al., 2024] Imad Eddine Tibermacine, Samuele Russo, Ahmed Tibermacine, Abdelaziz Rabehi, Bachir Nail, Kamel Kadri, and Christian Napoli. Rieman- nian geometry-based EEG approaches: A literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20250, 2024.
  35. [Tuzel et al., 2007] Oncel Tuzel, Fatih Porikli, and Peter Meer. Human detection via classification on riemannian manifolds. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 1-8, 2007.
  36. [Varoquaux et al., 2010] Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gram- fort, Jean-Baptiste Poline, and Bertrand Thirion. Brain covariance selection: Better individual functional connec- tivity models using population prior. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 23, pages 1-9, 2010.
  37. [Wang et al., 2024] Rui Wang, Chen Hu, Ziheng Chen, Xi- aojun Wu, and Xiaoning Song. A grassmannian manifold self-attention network for signal classification. In Proceed- ings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 5099-5107, 2024. IJCAI
  38. [Wang et al., 2025] Tao Wang, Rui Mao, Shuang Liu, Erik Cambria, and Dong Ming. Explainable multi-frequency and multi-region fusion model for affective brain-computer interfaces. Information Fusion, 118:102971, 2025.
  39. [Wen et al., 2024] Huan Wen, Yucun Zhong, Lin Yao, and Yueming Wang. Neural correlates of motor/tactile imagery and tactile sensation in a BCI paradigm: A high-density EEG source imaging study. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 5:0118, 2024.
  40. [Xu and Yang, 2025] Biao Xu and Guanci Yang. Inter- pretability research of deep learning: A literature survey. Information Fusion, 115:102721, 2025.
  41. [Yger et al., 2017] Florian Yger, Maxime Berar, and Fabien Lotte. Riemannian approaches in brain-computer inter- faces: A review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25(10):1753-1762, 2017.
  42. [Zhang and Etemad, 2023] Guangyi Zhang and Ali Etemad. Spatio-temporal EEG representation learning on rieman- nian manifold and euclidean space. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 8(2):1469- 1483, 2023.
  43. [Zhang and Li, 2025] Haodong Zhang and Hongqi Li. Transformer-based EEG decoding: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02320, 2025.
  44. [Zhang et al., 2023] Dongxue Zhang, Huiying Li, and Jing- meng Xie. MI-CAT: A transformer-based domain adap- tation network for motor imagery classification. Neural Networks, 165:451-462, 2023.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards