Proceedings

Bridging the Biophysical Gap: Holistic Environmental Awareness for 3D Linker Design

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 4876-4884.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/543

Abstract

3D molecular linker design is a critical task in structure-based drug discovery, which requires the precise synthesis of chemical bridges to connect fragments within the constrained environment of a protein binding pocket. Existing methods often suffer from environmental blindness, treating the inter-fragment space as a vacuum and yielding candidates with poor binding affinity or severe steric clashes. To address this, we propose LinkerBridge, an equivariant framework that unifies biochemical semantics with physical constraints through two innovations: a Contextual Interaction-Aware Representation module that internalizes pre-existing biochemical semantics, and a Differentiable Physical Guidance mechanism derived from Van der Waals potentials to steer generation away from collision zones. Extensive evaluations on ZINC, GEOM, and BindingMOAD benchmarks, as well as Hsp90 and JNK3 case studies, demonstrate that LinkerBridge significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in real-world drug discovery.

  1. [Axelrod and Gomez-Bombarelli, 2022] Simon Axelrod and Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli. Geom, energy-annotated molecular conformations for property prediction and molecular generation. Scientific Data, 9(1):185, 2022.
  2. [Bai et al., 2021] Nan Bai, Sven A Miller, Grigorii V Andri- anov, Max Yates, Palani Kirubakaran, and John Karanico- las. Rationalizing protac-mediated ternary complex for- mation using rosetta. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 61(3):1368-1382, 2021.
  3. [Bancet et al., 2020] Alexandre Bancet, Claire Raingeval, Thierry Lomberget, Marc Le Borgne, Jean-Franc ¸ois Gui- chou, and Isabelle Krimm. Fragment linking strategies for structure-based drug design. Journal of medicinal chem- istry, 63(20):11420-11435, 2020.
  4. [Barker et al., 2010] John J Barker, Oliver Barker, Stephen M Courtney, Mihaly Gardiner, Thomas Hes- terkamp, Osamu Ichihara, Owen Mather, Christian AGN Montalbetti, Annett Müller, Mario Varasi, et al. Dis- covery of a novel hsp90 inhibitor by fragment linking. ChemMedChem, 5(10):1697-1700, 2010.
  5. [Békés et al., 2022] Miklós Békés, David R Langley, and Craig M Crews. Protac targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 21(3):181- 200, 2022.
  6. [Bickerton et al., 2012] G Richard Bickerton, Gaia V Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L Hopkins. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs. Nature chemistry, 4(2):90-98, 2012.
  7. [Corso et al., 2022] Gabriele Corso, Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing, Regina Barzilay, and Tommi Jaakkola. Diffdock: Diffusion steps, twists, and turns for molecular docking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01776, 2022.
  8. [Elesedy and Zaidi, 2021] Bryn Elesedy and Sheheryar Zaidi. Provably strict generalisation benefit for equiv- ariant models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2959-2969. PMLR, 2021.
  9. [Erlanson et al., 2016] Daniel A Erlanson, Stephen W Fesik, Roderick E Hubbard, Wolfgang Jahnke, and Harren Jhoti. Twenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discov- ery. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 15(9):605-619, 2016.
  10. [Ertl and Schuffenhauer, 2009] Peter Ertl and Ansgar Schuf- fenhauer. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. Journal of cheminformatics, 1(1):8, 2009.
  11. [Farnaby et al., 2019] William Farnaby, Manfred Koegl, Michael J Roy, Claire Whitworth, Emelyne Diers, Nicole Trainor, David Zollman, Steffen Steurer, Jale Karolyi- Oezguer, Carina Riedmueller, et al. Baf complex vulner- abilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based protac design. Nature chemical biology, 15(7):672-680, 2019.
  12. [Garcia Satorras et al., 2021] Victor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Fabian Fuchs, Ingmar Posner, and Max Welling. E (n) equivariant normalizing flows. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:4181-4192, 2021.
  13. [Guan et al., 2023] Jiaqi Guan, Wesley Wei Qian, Xingang Peng, Yufeng Su, Jian Peng, and Jianzhu Ma. 3d equiv- ariant diffusion for target-aware molecule generation and affinity prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03543, 2023.
  14. [Halgren, 1996] Thomas A Halgren. Merck molecular force field. i. basis, form, scope, parameterization, and perfor- mance of mmff94. Journal of computational chemistry, 17(5-6):490-519, 1996.
  15. [Ho et al., 2020] Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840-6851, 2020.
  16. [Hoogeboom et al., 2022] Emiel Hoogeboom, Vıctor Garcia Satorras, Clément Vignac, and Max Welling. Equivari- ant diffusion for molecule generation in 3d. In Interna- tional conference on machine learning, pages 8867-8887.
  17. PMLR, 2022.
  18. [Hu et al., 2005] Liegi Hu, Mark L Benson, Richard D Smith, Michael G Lerner, and Heather A Carlson. Bind- ing moad (mother of all databases). Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 60(3):333-340, 2005.
  19. [Huang et al., 2022] Yinan Huang, Xingang Peng, Jianzhu Ma, and Muhan Zhang. 3dlinker: an e (3) equivariant variational autoencoder for molecular linker design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07309, 2022.
  20. [Igashov et al., 2024] Ilia Igashov, Hannes Stärk, Clément Vignac, Arne Schneuing, Victor Garcia Satorras, Pascal Frossard, Max Welling, Michael Bronstein, and Bruno Correia. Equivariant 3d-conditional diffusion model for molecular linker design. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(4):417-427, 2024.
  21. [Imrie et al., 2020] Fergus Imrie, Anthony R Bradley, Mi- haela van der Schaar, and Charlotte M Deane. Deep gen- erative models for 3d linker design. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 60(4):1983-1995, 2020.
  22. [Imrie et al., 2021] Fergus Imrie, Thomas E Hadfield, An- thony R Bradley, and Charlotte M Deane. Deep genera- tive design with 3d pharmacophoric constraints. Chemical science, 12(43):14577-14589, 2021.
  23. [Ingraham et al., 2023] John B Ingraham, Max Baranov, Zak Costello, Karl W Barber, Wujie Wang, Ahmed Ismail, Vincent Frappier, Dana M Lord, Christopher Ng-Thow- Hing, Erik R Van Vlack, et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. Nature, 623(7989):1070-1078, 2023.
  24. [Jing et al., 2022] Bowen Jing, Gabriele Corso, Jeffrey Chang, Regina Barzilay, and Tommi Jaakkola. Torsional diffusion for molecular conformer generation. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:24240-24253, 2022.
  25. [Lin et al., 2025] Haitao Lin, Yufei Huang, Odin Zhang, Siqi Ma, Meng Liu, Xuanjing Li, Lirong Wu, Jishui Wang, Tingjun Hou, and Stan Z Li. Diffbp: Generative diffu- sion of 3d molecules for target protein binding. Chemical Science, 16(3):1417-1431, 2025.
  26. [Lugmayr et al., 2022] Andreas Lugmayr, Martin Danell- jan, Andres Romero, Fisher Yu, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11461-11471, 2022.
  27. [Luo et al., 2022] Shitong Luo, Yufeng Su, Xingang Peng, Sheng Wang, Jian Peng, and Jianzhu Ma. Antigen-specific antibody design and optimization with diffusion-based generative models for protein structures. Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, 35:9754-9767, 2022.
  28. [Peng et al., 2023] Xingang Peng, Jiaqi Guan, Qiang Liu, and Jianzhu Ma. Moldiff: Addressing the atom-bond in- consistency problem in 3d molecule diffusion generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07508, 2023.
  29. [Putta et al., 2005] Santosh Putta, Gregory A Landrum, and Julie E Penzotti. Conformation mining: an algorithm for finding biologically relevant conformations. Journal of medicinal chemistry, 48(9):3313-3318, 2005.
  30. [Qiao et al., 2022] Zhuoran Qiao, Weili Nie, Arash Vahdat, Thomas F Miller III, and Anima Anandkumar. Dynamic- backbone protein-ligand structure prediction with mul- tiscale generative diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15171, 1, 2022.
  31. [Rath and Condurache, 2022] Matthias Rath and Alexan- dru Paul Condurache. Improving the sample-complexity of deep classification networks with invariant integration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03967, 2022.
  32. [Salentin et al., 2015] Sebastian Salentin, Sven Schreiber, V Joachim Haupt, Melissa F Adasme, and Michael Schroeder. Plip: fully automated protein-ligand inter- action profiler. Nucleic acids research, 43(W1):W443- W447, 2015.
  33. [Schneuing et al., 2024] Arne Schneuing, Charles Harris, Yuanqi Du, Kieran Didi, Arian Jamasb, Ilia Igashov, Weitao Du, Carla Gomes, Tom L Blundell, Pietro Lio, et al. Structure-based drug design with equivariant diffu- sion models. Nature Computational Science, 4(12):899- 909, 2024.
  34. [Sheng and Zhang, 2013] Chunquan Sheng and Wannian Zhang. Fragment informatics and computational fragment-based drug design: an overview and update. Medicinal Research Reviews, 33(3):554-598, 2013.
  35. [Shi et al., 2021] Chence Shi, Shitong Luo, Minkai Xu, and Jian Tang. Learning gradient fields for molecular confor- mation generation. In International conference on ma- chine learning, pages 9558-9568. PMLR, 2021.
  36. [Sohl-Dickstein et al., 2015] Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermody- namics. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2256-2265. pmlr, 2015.
  37. [Su et al., 2018] Minyi Su, Qifan Yang, Yu Du, Guoqin Feng, Zhihai Liu, Yan Li, and Renxiao Wang. Com- parative assessment of scoring functions: the casf-2016 update. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 59(2):895-913, 2018.
  38. [Trott and Olson, 2010] Oleg Trott and Arthur J Olson. Autodock vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimiza- tion, and multithreading. Journal of computational chem- istry, 31(2):455-461, 2010.
  39. [Vignac et al., 2022] Clement Vignac, Igor Krawczuk, An- toine Siraudin, Bohan Wang, Volkan Cevher, and Pascal Frossard. Digress: Discrete denoising diffusion for graph generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14734, 2022.
  40. [Watson et al., 2022] Joseph L Watson, David Juergens, Nathaniel R Bennett, Brian L Trippe, Jason Yim, He- len E Eisenach, Woody Ahern, Andrew J Borst, Robert J Ragotte, Lukas F Milles, et al. Broadly applicable and accurate protein design by integrating structure prediction networks and diffusion generative models. BioRxiv, pages 2022-12, 2022.
  41. [Weininger, 1988] David Weininger. Smiles, a chemical lan- guage and information system. 1. introduction to method- ology and encoding rules. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 28(1):31-36, 1988.
  42. [Xu et al., 2021] Minkai Xu, Shitong Luo, Yoshua Bengio, Jian Peng, and Jian Tang. Learning neural generative dynamics for molecular conformation generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10240, 2021.
  43. [Xu et al., 2022] Minkai Xu, Lantao Yu, Yang Song, Chence Shi, Stefano Ermon, and Jian Tang. Geodiff: A geometric diffusion model for molecular conformation generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.02923, 2022.
  44. [Yang et al., 2020] Yuyao Yang, Shuangjia Zheng, Shimin Su, Chao Zhao, Jun Xu, and Hongming Chen. Syntalinker: automatic fragment linking with deep conditional trans- former neural networks. Chemical science, 11(31):8312- 8322, 2020.
  45. [Zhou et al., 2024] Xiangxin Zhou, Jiaqi Guan, Yijia Zhang, Xingang Peng, Liang Wang, and Jianzhu Ma. Reprogram- ming pretrained target-specific diffusion models for dual- target drug design. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 37:87255-87281, 2024.
  46. [Zhung et al., 2024] Wonho Zhung, Hyeongwoo Kim, and Woo Youn Kim. 3d molecular generative framework for interaction-guided drug design. Nature Communications, 15(1):2688, 2024.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards