Proceedings

DenseKoopman: A Plug-and-Play Framework for Dense Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 1020-1028.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/113

Abstract

Pedestrian trajectory prediction has emerged as a core component of human-robot interaction and autonomous driving. Fast and accurate prediction of surrounding pedestrians contributes to making decisions and improves safety and efficiency. However, pedestrians’ future trajectories will interact with their surrounding traffic participants. As the density of pedestrians increases, the complexity of such interactions also increases significantly, leading to an inevitable decrease in the accuracy of pedestrian trajectory prediction. To address this issue, we propose DenseKoopman, a plug-and-play framework for dense pedestrian trajectory prediction. Specifically, we introduce the Koopman operator theory to find an embedding space for a global linear approximation of a nonlinear pedestrian motion system. By encoding historical trajectories as linear state embeddings in the Koopman space, we transforms nonlinear trajectory data for pedestrians in dense scenes. This linearized representation greatly reduces the complexity of dense pedestrian trajectory prediction. Extensive experiments on pedestrian trajectory prediction benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of the proposed framework. We also conducted an analysis of the data transformation to explore how our DenseKoopman framework works with each validation method and uncovers motion patterns that may be hidden within the trajectory data. Code is available at https://github.com/lixianbang/DenseKoopman.

  1. [Abraham and Murphey, 2019] Ian Abraham and Todd D Murphey. Active learning of dynamics for data-driven control using koopman operators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 35(5):1071-1083, 2019.
  2. [Alahi et al., 2016] Alexandre Alahi, Kratarth Goel, Vignesh Ramanathan, Alexandre Robicquet, Li Fei-Fei, and Sil- vio Savarese. Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 961-971, 2016.
  3. [Avila and Mezić, 2020] Allan M Avila and I Mezić. Data- driven analysis and forecasting of highway traffic dynam- ics. Nature communications, 11(1):2090, 2020.
  4. [Bagheri, 2013] Shervin Bagheri. Koopman-mode decom- position of the cylinder wake. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 726:596-623, 2013.
  5. [Batchelor, 1967] George Keith Batchelor. An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge university press, 1967.
  6. [Berger et al., 2015] Erik Berger, Mark Sastuba, David Vogt, Bernhard Jung, and Heni Ben Amor. Estimation of pertur- bations in robotic behavior using dynamic mode decom- position. Advanced Robotics, 29(5):331-343, 2015.
  7. [Bruder et al., 2021a] Daniel Bruder, Xun Fu, R. Brent Gillespie, C. David Remy, and Ram Vasudevan. Data- driven control of soft robots using koopman operator the- ory. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 37(3):948-961, 2021.
  8. [Bruder et al., 2021b] Daniel Bruder, Xun Fu, R Brent Gille- spie, C David Remy, and Ram Vasudevan. Koopman- based control of a soft continuum manipulator under vari- able loading conditions. IEEE robotics and automation letters, 6(4):6852-6859, 2021.
  9. [Chen et al., 2021] Guangyi Chen, Junlong Li, Nuoxing Zhou, Liangliang Ren, and Jiwen Lu. Personalized trajec- tory prediction via distribution discrimination. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 15580-15589, 2021.
  10. [Dendorfer et al., 2020] Patrick Dendorfer, Hamid Rezatofighi, Anton Milan, Javen Shi, Daniel Cre- mers, Ian D. Reid, Stefan Roth, Konrad Schindler, and Laura Leal-Taixé. Mot20: A benchmark for multi object tracking in crowded scenes. CoRR, abs/2003.09003, 2020.
  11. [Dendorfer et al., 2021] Patrick Dendorfer, Sven Elflein, and Laura Leal-Taixé. Mg-gan: A multi-generator model pre- venting out-of-distribution samples in pedestrian trajec- tory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, pages 13158- 13167, 2021.
  12. [Gu et al., 2022] Tianpei Gu, Guangyi Chen, Junlong Li, Chunze Lin, Yongming Rao, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Stochastic trajectory prediction via motion indeterminacy diffusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17113- 17122, 2022.
  13. [Helbing and Molnár, 1995] Dirk Helbing and Péter Molnár. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 51:4282-4286, May 1995.
  14. [Jeon et al., 2023] Yuntae Jeon, Dai Quoc Tran, Minsoo Park, and Seunghee Park. Leveraging future trajectory pre- diction for multi-camera people tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 5398-5407, 2023.
  15. [Jiang et al., 2024] Han Jiang, Yilong Ren, Jing Fang, Yang Yang, Liang Xu, and Haiyang Yu. Ship: A state-aware hybrid incentive program for urban crowd sensing with for-hire vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems, 25:3041-3053, 2024.
  16. [Koopman and Neumann, 1932] Bernard O Koopman and J v Neumann. Dynamical systems of continuous spec- tra. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 18(3):255-263, 1932.
  17. [Koopman, 1931] Bernard O. Koopman. Hamiltonian sys- tems and transformation in hilbert space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, pages 315-318, 1931.
  18. [Kosaraju et al., 2019] Vineet Kosaraju, Amir Sadeghian, Roberto Martín-Martín, Ian Reid, Hamid Rezatofighi, and Silvio Savarese. Social-bigat: Multimodal trajectory fore- casting using bicycle-gan and graph attention networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol- ume 32.
  19. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  20. [Kostic et al., 2022] Vladimir Kostic, Pietro Novelli, An- dreas Maurer, Carlo Ciliberto, Lorenzo Rosasco, and Mas- similiano Pontil. Learning dynamical systems via koop- man operator regression in reproducing kernel hilbert spaces. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4017-4031.
  21. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022.
  22. [Lerner et al., 2007] Alon Lerner, Yiorgos Chrysanthou, and Dani Lischinski. Crowds by example. Computer Graphics Forum, 26, 2007.
  23. [Li et al., 2022] Haopeng Li, Lingbo Liu, Kunlin Yang, Shi- nan Liu, Junyu Gao, Bin Zhao, Rui Zhang, and Jun Hou. Video crowd localization with multifocus gaussian neigh- borhood attention and a large-scale benchmark. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 31:6032-6047, 2022.
  24. [Li et al., 2023] Cruz Y Li, Zengshun Chen, Xuelin Zhang, KT Tim, and Chongjia Lin. Koopman analysis by the dy- namic mode decomposition in wind engineering. Jour- nal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 232:105295, 2023.
  25. [Linscott et al., 2023] Edward B Linscott, Nicola Colonna, Riccardo De Gennaro, Ngoc Linh Nguyen, Giovanni Borghi, Andrea Ferretti, Ismaila Dabo, and Nicola Marzari. koopmans: An open-source package for accu- rately and efficiently predicting spectral properties with koopmans functionals. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 19(20):7097-7111, 2023.
  26. [Lisotto et al., 2019] Matteo Lisotto, Pasquale Coscia, and Lamberto Ballan. Social and scene-aware trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Oct 2019.
  27. [Mezić and Banaszuk, 2004] Igor Mezić and Andrzej Ba- naszuk. Comparison of systems with complex behav- ior. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 197(1-2):101-133, 2004.
  28. [Mezić, 2013] Igor Mezić. Analysis of fluid flows via spec- tral properties of the koopman operator. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 45:357-378, 2013.
  29. [Mitjans et al., 2022] Marc Mitjans, David M Levine, Louis N Awad, and Roberto Tron. Koopman pose pre- dictions for temporally consistent human walking estima- tions. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on In- telligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5257-5264. IEEE, 2022.
  30. [Mohamed et al., 2022] Abduallah Mohamed, Deyao Zhu, Warren Vu, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Christian Claudel. Social-implicit: Rethinking trajectory prediction evalua- tion and the effectiveness of implicit maximum likelihood estimation. In Computer Vision -ECCV 2022, pages 463- 479. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2022.
  31. [Pellegrini et al., 2009] S. Pellegrini, A. Ess, K. Schindler, and L. van Gool. You'll never walk alone: Modeling so- cial behavior for multi-target tracking. In 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 261- 268, 2009.
  32. [Pellegrini et al., 2010] Stefano Pellegrini, Andreas Ess, and Luc Van Gool. Improving data association by joint model- ing of pedestrian trajectories and groupings. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2010, pages 452-465. Springer, 2010.
  33. [Ren et al., 2022] Yilong Ren, Han Jiang, Nan Ji, and Haiyang Yu. Tbsm: A traffic burst-sensitive model for short-term prediction under special events. Knowledge- Based Systems, 240:108120, 2022.
  34. [Salzmann et al., 2020] Tim Salzmann, Boris Ivanovic, Punarjay Chakravarty, and Marco Pavone. Trajectron++: Dynamically-feasible trajectory forecasting with heteroge- neous data. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020, pages 683- 700, 2020.
  35. [Schmid, 2010] Peter J Schmid. Dynamic mode decomposi- tion of numerical and experimental data. Journal of fluid mechanics, 656:5-28, 2010.
  36. [Shi et al., 2019] Xiaodan Shi, Xiaowei Shao, Zhiling Guo, Guangming Wu, Haoran Zhang, and Ryosuke Shibasaki. Pedestrian trajectory prediction in extremely crowded sce- narios. Sensors, 19(5):1223, 2019.
  37. [Sundararaman et al., 2021] Ramana Sundararaman, Cedric De Almeida Braga, Eric Marchand, and Julien Pettre. Tracking pedestrian heads in dense crowd. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 3865-3875, 2021.
  38. [Tsuneda et al., 2010] Takao Tsuneda, Jong-Won Song, Satoshi Suzuki, and Kimihiko Hirao. On koopmans' theo- rem in density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 133(17):174101, 11 2010.
  39. [Wang et al., 2022] Jingke Wang, Tengju Ye, Ziqing Gu, and Junbo Chen. Ltp: Lane-based trajectory prediction for autonomous driving. In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 17113-17121. IEEE, 2022.
  40. [Wang et al., 2023] Xinghan Wang, Xin Xu, and Yadong Mu. Neural koopman pooling: Control-inspired tempo- ral dynamics encoding for skeleton-based action recog- nition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10597- 10607, 2023.
  41. [Williams et al., 2015] Matthew O Williams, Ioannis G Kevrekidis, and Clarence W Rowley. A data-driven ap- proximation of the koopman operator: Extending dy- namic mode decomposition. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 25:1307-1346, 2015.
  42. [Wu et al., 2017] Hao Wu, Feliks Nüske, Fabian Paul, Ste- fan Klus, Péter Koltai, and Frank Noé. Variational koop- man models: Slow collective variables and molecular ki- netics from short off-equilibrium simulations. The Journal of chemical physics, 146(15), 2017.
  43. [Yu et al., 2023] Xinyan Yu, Marius Hoggenmueller, and Martin Tomitsch. Your way or my way: Improv- ing human-robot co-navigation through robot intent and pedestrian prediction visualisations. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human- Robot Interaction, pages 211-221, 2023.
  44. [Zhang et al., 2021] Shaoxiong Zhang, Yunhong Wang, and Annan Li. Cross-view gait recognition with deep univer- sal linear embeddings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9095-9104, 2021.
  45. [Zhang et al., 2022] Xinglong Zhang, Wei Pan, Riccardo Scattolini, Shuyou Yu, and Xin Xu. Robust tube-based model predictive control with koopman operators. Auto- matica, 137(3):110114, 2022.
  46. [Zhang et al., 2023] Liang Zhang, Nathaniel Xu, Pengfei Yang, Gaojie Jin, Cheng-Chao Huang, and Lijun Zhang. Trajpac: Towards robustness verification of pedestrian trajectory prediction models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 8327-8339, 2023.
  47. [Zhang et al., 2024] Yaqian Zhang, Kai Ding, Jizhuang Hui, Sichao Liu, Wanjin Guo, and Lihui Wang. Skeleton- rgb integrated highly similar human action prediction in human-robot collaborative assembly. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 86:102659, 2024.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards