Proceedings

Boosting Few-Shot Open-Set Object Detection via Prompt Learning and Robust Decision Boundary

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 6606-6614.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/735

Abstract

Few-shot Open-set Object Detection (FOOD) poses a challenge in many open-world scenarios. It aims to train an open-set detector to detect known objects while rejecting unknowns with scarce training samples. Existing FOOD methods are subject to limited visual information, and often exhibit an ambiguous decision boundary between known and unknown classes. To address these limitations, we propose the first prompt-based few-shot open-set object detection framework, which exploits additional textual information and delves into constructing a robust decision boundary for unknown rejection. Specifically, as no available training data for unknown classes, we select pseudo-unknown samples with Attribution-Gradient based Pseudo-unknown Mining (AGPM), which leverages the discrepancy in attribution gradients to quantify uncertainty. Subsequently, we propose Conditional Evidence Decoupling (CED) to decouple and extract distinct knowledge from selected pseudo-unknown samples by eliminating opposing evidence. This optimization process can enhance the discrimination between known and unknown classes. To further regularize the model and form a robust decision boundary for unknown rejection, we introduce Abnormal Distribution Calibration (ADC) to calibrate the output probability distribution of local abnormal features in pseudo-unknown samples. Our method achieves superior performance over previous state-of-the-art approaches, improving the average recall of unknown class by 7.24% across all shots in VOC10-5-5 dataset settings and 1.38% in VOC-COCO dataset settings. Our source code is available at https://gitee.com/VR_NAVE/ced-food.

  1. 1-shot 3-shot Method mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ ORE [Joseph et al., 2021] 43.25 / 8.62 18.25 / - 9.54 / 930.30 45.88 / 14.52 22.23 / - 9.88 / 1058.70
  2. PROSER [Zhou et al., 2021] 41.64 / 8.49 30.95 / 15.41 11.15 / 994.60 43.30 / 15.16 32.30 / 16.17 10.45 / 1021.70 OPENDET [Han et al., 2022] 43.45 / 8.27 33.64 / 17.28 10.47 / 867.30 46.47 / 14.09 30.62 / 15.89 9.27 / 954.50 FOOD [Su et al., 2024] 43.97 / 8.95 43.72 / 23.51 6.96 / 598.60 48.48 / 16.83 44.52 / 23.58 7.83 / 859.00 FOODv2 [Su et al., 2023] 45.12 / 11.56 60.03 / 31.19 -/ - 48.90 / 18.96 61.21 / 32.02 -/ - OPENDET(+Ours) 50.28 / 18.40 78.56 / 36.76 5.89 / 781.60 55.61 / 33.03 78.87 / 38.43 4.75 / 547.20 FOODv2(+Ours) 53.71 / 22.62 77.28 / 34.70 5.65 / 1042.20 56.53 / 35.65 80.19 / 36.80 5.52 / 949.80 Ours 51.94 / 21.43 79.88 / 38.12 4.12 / 459.60 53.09 / 31.70 80.55 / 39.53 3.72 / 451.20
  3. 5-shot 10-shot Method mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ ORE [Joseph et al., 2021] 46.29 / 18.49 23.01 / - 10.16 /1019.70 48.17 / 25.40 23.48 / - 9.65 / 1063.70
  4. PROSER [Zhou et al., 2021] 45.12 / 20.08 32.68 / 16.48 10.65 / 1009.80 48.35 / 25.13 32.61 / 17.01 10.29 / 956.70 OPENDET [Han et al., 2022] 47.56 / 17.90 32.13 / 16.72 9.01 / 1031.50 50.95 / 25.14 36.30 / 18.89 8.50 / 1021.40 FOOD [Su et al., 2024] 50.18 / 23.10 45.65 / 23.61 7.59 / 908.00 53.23 / 28.60 45.84 / 23.86 6.99 / 900.20 FOODv2 [Su et al., 2023] 52.55 / 27.31 62.02 / 32.79 -/ - 57.24 / 32.63 62.14 / 32.80 -/ - OPENDET(+Ours) 56.01/ 36.57 79.70 / 39.42 4.53 / 519.40 58.70 / 42.69 74.60 / 37.16 4.90 / 530.60 FOODv2(+Ours) 55.13 / 38.28 80.62 / 37.05 4.98 / 1185.60 60.84 / 45.56 79.45 / 37.17 4.12 / 953.30 Ours 54.35 / 36.67 81.37 / 40.32 3.78 / 512.20 58.55 / 43.52 79.39 / 39.79 3.43 / 546.30
  5. Table 1: Few-Shot Open-Set Object Detection results on VOC10-5-5. '(+Ours)' indicates the implementation with our prompt-based FOOD framework while 'Ours' denotes our framework with all of our methods. Bold indicates the best, underlined indicates the second best. 1-shot 5-shot Method mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ ORE [Joseph et al., 2021] 14.14 / 2.18 4.59 / - 12.08 / 1087.00 16.21 / 6.29 4.99 / - 12.30 / 1344.00
  6. PROSER [Zhou et al., 2021] 13.58 / 2.32 7.53 / 3.07 11.68 / 925.30 15.67 / 6.40 9.59 / 4.08 12.56 / 1165.90 OPENDET [Han et al., 2022] 16.01 / 2.29 7.24 / 3.14 9.82 / 690.90 17.16 / 6.56 11.49 / 5.21 9.55 / 1176.90 FOOD [Su et al., 2024] 15.83 / 2.26 15.76 / 7.20 6.78 / 485.00 18.08 / 6.69 20.02 / 9.45 7.37 / 859.00 FOODv2 [Su et al., 2023] 18.54 / 4.33 30.87 / 14.13 -/ - 19.88 / 11.95 32.53 / 15.74 -/ - OPENDET(+Ours) 18.42 / 4.42 36.70 / 16.17 5.42 / 796.80 20.42 / 12.23 39.10 / 17.89 4.83 / 742.40 FOODv2(+Ours) 20.44 / 5.69 36.25 / 15.74 5.14 / 945.40 21.12 / 12.47 39.05 / 16.72 4.70 / 835.90 Ours 19.49 / 5.41 38.53 / 16.68 4.51 / 638.70 21.46 / 13.24 40.52 / 17.91 2.99 / 808.90 10-shot 30-shot Method mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ mAP K / mAP N ↑ R U / AR U ↑ W I / AOSE ↓ ORE [Joseph et al., 2021] 17.98 / 8.75 5.13 / - 11.65 / 1463.20 23.07 / 15.17 5.51 / - 11.22 / 1867.00
  7. PROSER [Zhou et al., 2021] 17.00 / 8.75 10.06 / 4.89 12.47 / 1160.00 21.44 / 14.30 12.06 / 5.98 12.00 / 1561.60 OPENDET [Han et al., 2022] 18.53 / 8.70 13.89 / 6.32 9.83 / 1400.60 22.93 / 14.02 18.07 / 8.76 9.02 / 1818.00 FOOD [Su et al., 2024] 20.17 / 9.48 21.48 / 9.56 7.59 / 1099.30 23.90 / 14.17 23.17 / 11.45 8.13 / 1480.00 FOODv2 [Su et al., 2023] 22.64 / 13.82 32.78 / 16.52 -/ - 23.71 / 17.67 35.74 / 17.26 -/ - OPENDET(+Ours) 22.74 / 15.34 38.12 / 17.72 5.12 / 934.30 25.34 / 21.56 38.78 / 16.68 4.97 / 1463.6 FOODv2(+Ours) 24.42 / 16.83 37.33 / 16.04 4.38 / 1046.60 26.70 / 22.73 39.46 / 17.24 4.23 / 1442.40 Ours 23.75 / 16.77 38.69 / 17.06 2.58 / 856.40 25.72 / 21.16 39.43 / 17.52 2.46 / 1339.30
  8. [Boudiaf et al., 2023] Malik Boudiaf, Etienne Bennequin, Myriam Tami, Antoine Toubhans, Pablo Piantanida, Ce- line Hudelot, and Ismail Ben Ayed. Open-set likelihood maximization for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 24007-24016, 2023.
  9. [Chen et al., 2023] Jinggang Chen, Junjie Li, Xiaoyang Qu, Jianzong Wang, Jiguang Wan, and Jing Xiao. Gaia: Delv- ing into gradient-based attribution abnormality for out-of- distribution detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
  10. [Everingham et al., 2010] Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher KI Williams, John Winn, and Andrew Zisser- man. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. In- ternational journal of computer vision, 88:303-338, 2010.
  11. [Han et al., 2022] Jiaming Han, Yuqiang Ren, Jian Ding, Xingjia Pan, Ke Yan, and Gui-Song Xia. Expanding low- density latent regions for open-set object detection. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9591-9600, 2022.
  12. [He et al., 2016] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recog- nition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770-778, 2016.
  13. [Jeong et al., 2021] Minki Jeong, Seokeon Choi, and Chang- ick Kim. Few-shot open-set recognition by transforma- tion consistency. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 12566-12575, 2021.
  14. [Jøsang, 2016] Audun Jøsang. Subjective logic, volume 3. Springer, 2016.
  15. [Joseph et al., 2021] KJ Joseph, Salman Khan, Fahad Shah- baz Khan, and Vineeth N Balasubramanian. Towards open world object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5830-5840, 2021.
  16. [Li et al., 2024] Tianqi Li, Guansong Pang, Xiao Bai, Wen- jun Miao, and Jin Zheng. Learning transferable negative prompts for out-of-distribution detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 17584-17594, 2024.
  17. [Lin et al., 2014] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Be- longie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Com- mon objects in context. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, Septem- ber 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 13, pages 740-755. Springer, 2014.
  18. [Lin et al., 2017] Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Dollár. Focal loss for dense ob- ject detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2980-2988, 2017.
  19. [Lis et al., 2019] Krzysztof Lis, Krishna Nakka, Pascal Fua, and Mathieu Salzmann. Detecting the unexpected via im- age resynthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2152-2161, 2019.
  20. [Liu et al., 2020] Bo Liu, Hao Kang, Haoxiang Li, Gang Hua, and Nuno Vasconcelos. Few-shot open-set recogni- tion using meta-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8798-8807, 2020.
  21. [Liu et al., 2023] Shilong Liu, Zhaoyang Zeng, Tianhe Ren, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Jie Yang, Chunyuan Li, Jianwei Yang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, et al. Grounding dino: Mar- rying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499, 2023.
  22. [Minderer et al., 2022] Matthias Minderer, Alexey Grit- senko, Austin Stone, Maxim Neumann, Dirk Weissenborn, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Aravindh Mahendran, Anurag Arnab, Mostafa Dehghani, Zhuoran Shen, et al. Simple open- vocabulary object detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 728-755. Springer, 2022.
  23. [Miyai et al., 2023] Atsuyuki Miyai, Qing Yu, Go Irie, and Kiyoharu Aizawa. Locoop: Few-shot out-of-distribution detection via prompt learning. Advances in Neural Infor- mation Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
  24. [Nag et al., 2023] Sayak Nag, Dripta S Raychaudhuri, Su- joy Paul, and Amit K Roy-Chowdhury. Reconstruction guided meta-learning for few shot open set recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine In- telligence, 2023.
  25. [Radford et al., 2021] Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agar- wal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from nat- ural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748-8763. PMLR, 2021.
  26. [Redmon et al., 2016] Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 779-788, 2016.
  27. [Ren et al., 2015] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Gir- shick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time ob- ject detection with region proposal networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  28. [Sarkar et al., 2024] Hiran Sarkar, Vishal Chudasama, Naoyuki Onoe, Pankaj Wasnik, and Vineeth N Balasub- ramanian. Open-set object detection by aligning known class representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 219-228, 2024.
  29. [Selvaraju et al., 2017] Ramprasaath R Selvaraju, Michael Cogswell, Abhishek Das, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on com- puter vision, pages 618-626, 2017.
  30. [Sensoy et al., 2018] Murat Sensoy, Lance Kaplan, and Melih Kandemir. Evidential deep learning to quantify classification uncertainty. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  31. [Sentz and Ferson, 2002] Kari Sentz and Scott Ferson. Com- bination of evidence in dempster-shafer theory. San- dia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States), 2002.
  32. [Simonyan et al., 2013] Karen Simonyan, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zisserman. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6034, 2013.
  33. [Su et al., 2023] Binyi Su, Hua Zhang, and Zhong Zhou. Hsic-based moving weight averaging for few-shot open- set object detection. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM In- ternational Conference on Multimedia, pages 5358-5369, 2023.
  34. [Su et al., 2024] Binyi Su, Hua Zhang, Jingzhi Li, and Zhong Zhou. Toward generalized few-shot open-set ob- ject detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 33:1389-1402, 2024.
  35. [Tian et al., 2020] Zhi Tian, Chunhua Shen, Hao Chen, and Tong He. Fcos: A simple and strong anchor-free object detector. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Ma- chine Intelligence, 44(4):1922-1933, 2020.
  36. [Wang et al., 2020] Xin Wang, Thomas E Huang, Trevor Darrell, Joseph E Gonzalez, and Fisher Yu. Frustrat- ingly simple few-shot object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06957, 2020.
  37. [Wang et al., 2023a] Haoyu Wang, Guansong Pang, Peng Wang, Lei Zhang, Wei Wei, and Yanning Zhang. Glocal energy-based learning for few-shot open-set recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7507-7516, 2023.
  38. [Wang et al., 2023b] Yanghao Wang, Zhongqi Yue, Xian- Sheng Hua, and Hanwang Zhang. Random boxes are open-world object detectors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 6233-6243, 2023.
  39. [Zareian et al., 2021] Alireza Zareian, Kevin Dela Rosa, Derek Hao Hu, and Shih-Fu Chang. Open-vocabulary object detection using captions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14393-14402, 2021.
  40. [Zhong et al., 2022] Yiwu Zhong, Jianwei Yang, Pengchuan Zhang, Chunyuan Li, Noel Codella, Liunian Harold Li, Luowei Zhou, Xiyang Dai, Lu Yuan, Yin Li, et al. Region- clip: Region-based language-image pretraining. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16793-16803, 2022.
  41. [Zhou et al., 2021] Da-Wei Zhou, Han-Jia Ye, and De- Chuan Zhan. Learning placeholders for open-set recogni- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on com- puter vision and pattern recognition, pages 4401-4410, 2021.
  42. [Zhou et al., 2022a] Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 16816-16825, 2022.
  43. [Zhou et al., 2022b] Kaiyang Zhou, Jingkang Yang, Chen Change Loy, and Ziwei Liu. Learning to prompt for vision-language models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(9):2337-2348, 2022.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards