Proceedings

CDMIQA: A Cross-Domain Perceptual Method and Benchmark Dataset for Medical Image Quality Assessment

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AI and Health. Pages 6743-6751.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2026/750

Abstract

Medical image quality assessment (IQA) serves as a critical safeguard for precise clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, existing methods still face challenges arising from data scarcity and heterogeneity across imaging domains, which confine solutions to domain-specific designs and limit their cross-domain generalization ability. In response, we construct a multi-domain and multi-organ dataset comprising 9,105 2D and 3D medical images across three imaging domains and 18 organs, annotated by radiologists. Building upon this, we propose a cross-domain universal medical IQA method termed CDMIQA, which integrates efficient feature extractors with Hierarchical Perceptual Encoding Modules to capture and refine multi-level perceptual features while mitigating interference from noise and artifacts. Notably, the Adaptive Semantic Perception Module is designed to extract semantic features; it enhances adaptability to domain-specific images by dynamically encoding quality variations across different imaging domains and organs. Furthermore, a Top-down Feature Fusion Module is utilized to progressively aggregate features under the guidance of semantic information, reinforcing the model's feature representation capability. Experimental results on the proposed dataset demonstrate that our method outperforms standard competitors and exhibits superior generalization ability across diverse domains. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Leilei-Huang-work/CDMIQA.

  1. [Cavaro-Ménard et al., 2010] Christine Cavaro-Ménard, Lu Zhang, and Patrick Le Callet. Diagnostic quality assessment of medical images: Challenges and trends. In 2010 2nd European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP), pages 277-284. IEEE, 2010.
  2. [Chen et al., 2020] Lihui Chen, Xiaomin Yang, Gwanggil Jeon, Marco Anisetti, and Kai Liu. A trusted medical image super-resolution method based on feedback adap- tive weighted dense network. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 106:101857, 2020.
  3. [Chen et al., 2023] Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22367-22377, 2023.
  4. [Chen et al., 2024] Chaofeng Chen, Jiadi Mo, Jingwen Hou, Haoning Wu, Liang Liao, Wenxiu Sun, Qiong Yan, and Weisi Lin. Topiq: A top-down approach from semantics to distortions for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans- actions on Image Processing, 33:2404-2418, 2024.
  5. [Chow and Paramesran, 2016] Li Sze Chow and Raveendran Paramesran. Review of medical image quality assessment. Biomedical signal processing and control, 27:145-154, 2016.
  6. [Dosovitskiy et al., 2020] Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Min- derer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  7. [Fu et al., 2019] Huazhu Fu, Boyang Wang, Jianbing Shen, Shanshan Cui, Yanwu Xu, Jiang Liu, and Ling Shao. Eval- uation of retinal image quality assessment networks in dif- ferent color-spaces. In International conference on medi- cal image computing and computer-assisted intervention, pages 48-56. Springer, 2019.
  8. [Gong et al., 2019] Hao Gong, Lifeng Yu, Shuai Leng, Samantha K Dilger, Liqiang Ren, Wei Zhou, Joel G Fletcher, and Cynthia H McCollough. A deep learning-and partial least square regression-based model observer for a low-contrast lesion detection task in ct. Medical physics, 46(5):2052-2063, 2019.
  9. [Guo et al., 2024] Hang Guo, Jinmin Li, Tao Dai, Zhihao Ouyang, Xudong Ren, and Shu-Tao Xia. Mambair: A sim- ple baseline for image restoration with state-space model. In European conference on computer vision, pages 222- 241. Springer, 2024.
  10. [Kang et al., 2014] Le Kang, Peng Ye, Yi Li, and David Do- ermann. Convolutional neural networks for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1733-1740, 2014.
  11. [Lee et al., 2022] Wonkyeong Lee, Eunbyeol Cho, Wonjin Kim, Hyebin Choi, Kyongmin Sarah Beck, Hyun Jung Yoon, Jongduk Baek, and Jang-Hwan Choi. No-reference perceptual ct image quality assessment based on a self- supervised learning framework. Machine Learning: Sci- ence and Technology, 3(4):045033, 2022.
  12. [Lee et al., 2025] Wonkyeong Lee, Fabian Wagner, Adrian Galdran, Yongyi Shi, Wenjun Xia, Ge Wang, Xuanqin Mou, Md Atik Ahamed, Abdullah Al Zubaer Imran, Ji Eun Oh, et al. Low-dose computed tomography percep- tual image quality assessment. Medical Image Analysis, 99:103343, 2025.
  13. [Lévêque et al., 2021] Lucie Lévêque, Meriem Outtas, Han- tao Liu, and Lu Zhang. Comparative study of the method- ologies used for subjective medical image quality assess- ment. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 66(15):15TR02, 2021.
  14. [Li et al., 2018] Ruoyu Li, Guangzhe Dai, Zhaoyang Wang, Shaode Yu, and Yaoqin Xie. Using signal-to-noise ratio to connect the quality assessment of natural and medi- cal images. In Tenth International Conference on Digi- tal Image Processing (ICDIP 2018), volume 10806, pages 1327-1332. SPIE, 2018.
  15. [Liang et al., 2021] Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vi- sion, pages 1833-1844, 2021.
  16. [Mittal et al., 2012a] Anish Mittal, Anush Krishna Moorthy, and Alan Conrad Bovik. No-reference image quality as- sessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on im- age processing, 21(12):4695-4708, 2012.
  17. [Mittal et al., 2012b] Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C Bovik. Making a "completely blind" image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal processing letters, 20(3):209-212, 2012.
  18. [Oszust et al., 2020a] Mariusz Oszust, Adam Piórkowski, and Rafał Obuchowicz. No-reference image quality as- sessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 84(3):1648-1660, 2020.
  19. [Oszust et al., 2020b] Mariusz Oszust, Adam Piórkowski, and Rafał Obuchowicz. No-reference image quality as- sessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 84(3):1648-1660, 2020.
  20. [Qi et al., 2021] Kehan Qi, Haoran Li, Chuyu Rong, Yu Gong, Cheng Li, Hairong Zheng, and Shanshan Wang. Blind image quality assessment for mri with a deep three-dimensional content-adaptive hyper-network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.06888, 2021.
  21. [Saad et al., 2012] Michele A Saad, Alan C Bovik, and Christophe Charrier. Blind image quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in the dct domain. IEEE transactions on Image Processing, 21(8):3339- 3352, 2012.
  22. [Shi et al., 2022] Chuying Shi, Jack Lee, Gechun Wang, Xinyan Dou, Fei Yuan, and Benny Zee. Assessment of image quality on color fundus retinal images using the automatic retinal image analysis. Scientific Reports, 12(1):10455, 2022.
  23. [Shi et al., 2024] Yongyi Shi, Wenjun Xia, Ge Wang, and Xuanqin Mou. Blind ct image quality assessment us- ing ddpm-derived content and transformer-based evalua- tor. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 43(10):3559- 3569, 2024.
  24. [Simi et al., 2021] VR Simi, Damodar Reddy Edla, and Justin Joseph. A no-reference metric to assess quality of denoising for magnetic resonance images. Biomedical Sig- nal Processing and Control, 70:102962, 2021.
  25. [Simonyan and Zisserman, 2014] Karen Simonyan and An- drew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
  26. [Stepień and Oszust, 2023] Igor Stepień and Mariusz Os- zust. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with multi-level and multi-model repre- sentations based on fusion of deep architectures. Engineer- ing Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123:106283, 2023.
  27. [Stpień et al., 2021] I Stpień, R Obuchowicz, A Piórkowski, and M Oszust. Fusion of deep convolutional neural net- works for no-reference magnetic resonance image quality assessment. Sensors, 21(4):1043, 2021.
  28. [Wang et al., 2018] Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jin- jin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution genera- tive adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops, pages 0-0, 2018.
  29. [Wu et al., 2024] Haoning Wu, Zicheng Zhang, Erli Zhang, Chaofeng Chen, Liang Liao, Annan Wang, Kaixin Xu, Chunyi Li, Jingwen Hou, Guangtao Zhai, et al. Q-instruct: Improving low-level visual abilities for multi-modality foundation models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 25490-25500, 2024.
  30. [Xun et al., 2025] Siyi Xun, Qiaoyu Li, Xiaohong Liu, Pu Huang, Guangtao Zhai, Yue Sun, Mingxiang Wu, Tao Tan, et al. Charting the path forward: Ct image quality assessment-an in-depth review. Journal of King Saud Uni- versity Computer and Information Sciences, 37(5):1-24, 2025.
  31. [Yang et al., 2022] Sidi Yang, Tianhe Wu, Shuwei Shi, Shan- shan Lao, Yuan Gong, Mingdeng Cao, Jiahao Wang, and Yujiu Yang. Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1191-1200, 2022.
  32. [Zago et al., 2018] Gabriel Tozatto Zago, Rodrigo Varejao Andreao, Bernadette Dorizzi, and Evandro Ottoni Teatini Salles. Retinal image quality assessment using deep learn- ing. Computers in biology and medicine, 103:64-70, 2018.
  33. [Zhang and Metaxas, 2024] Shaoting Zhang and Dimitris Metaxas. On the challenges and perspectives of founda- tion models for medical image analysis. Medical image analysis, 91:102996, 2024.
  34. [Zhang et al., 2018a] Weixia Zhang, Kede Ma, Jia Yan, Dex- iang Deng, and Zhou Wang. Blind image quality as- sessment using a deep bilinear convolutional neural net- work. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 30(1):36-47, 2018.
  35. [Zhang et al., 2018b] Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super- resolution using very deep residual channel attention net- works. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 286-301, 2018.
  36. [Zhang et al., 2018c] Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2472-2481, 2018.
  37. [Zhang et al., 2022] Jiale Zhang, Yulun Zhang, Jinjin Gu, Yongbing Zhang, Linghe Kong, and Xin Yuan. Accurate image restoration with attention retractable transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01427, 2022.
  38. [Zhou et al., 2018] Kang Zhou, Zaiwang Gu, Annan Li, Jun Cheng, Shenghua Gao, and Jiang Liu. Fundus image quality-guided diabetic retinopathy grading. In Interna- tional Workshop on Ophthalmic Medical Image Analysis, pages 245-252. Springer, 2018.
  39. [Zhou et al., 2023] Yupeng Zhou, Zhen Li, Chun-Le Guo, Song Bai, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Qibin Hou. Srformer: Permuted self-attention for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 12780-12791, 2023.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards