Proceedings

Leveraging Argumentation for Generating Robust Sample-based Explanations

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 3104-3111.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/346

Abstract

Explaining predictions made by inductive classifiers has become crucial with the rise of complex models acting more and more as black-boxes.

Abductive explanations are one of the most popular types of explanations that are provided for the purpose. They highlight feature-values that

are sufficient for making predictions. In the literature, they are generated by exploring the whole feature space, which is unreasonable in practice.

This paper solves the problem by introducing explanation functions that generate abductive explanations from a sample of instances. It shows

that such functions should be defined with great care since they cannot satisfy two desirable properties at the same time, namely existence of

explanations for every individual decision (success) and correctness of explanations (coherence). The paper provides a parameterized family of

argumentation-based explanation functions, each of which satisfies one of the two properties. It studies their formal properties and their experimental

behaviour on different datasets.

Leila Amgoud, Philippe Muller, and Henri Trenquier. 2023. Leveraging Argumentation for Generating Robust Sample-based Explanations. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-23. IJCAI, 3104–3111. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/346
Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards