Precarity and Solidarity: Preliminary Results on a Study of Queer and Disabled Fiction Writers’ Experiences with Generative AI
Precarity and Solidarity: Preliminary Results on a Study of Queer and Disabled Fiction Writers’ Experiences with Generative AI
Carolyn Lamb, Daniel G. Brown, Maura R. Grossman
Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
AI, Arts & Creativity. Pages 10117-10125.
https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2025/1124
We present a mixed-methods study of professional fiction writers' experiences with generative AI (genAI), primarily focused on queer and disabled writers. Queer and disabled writers are markedly more pessimistic than others about the impact of genAI on their industry, although pessimism is the majority attitude for all groups. We explore how genAI exacerbates existing causes of precarity for writers, reasons why writers are opposed to its use, and strategies used by marginalized fiction writers to safeguard their industry.
Keywords:
Theory and philosophy of arts and creativity in AI systems: Cultural and social impacts of AI on creativity, creative practice, education and society
Application domains: Text, literature and creative language
Theory and philosophy of arts and creativity in AI systems: Ethical issues raised by creative AI systems
