Proceedings

FGNet: Towards Filling the Intra-class and Inter-class Gaps for Few-shot Segmentation

Download BibTeX Cite

Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Main Track. Pages 1749-1758.

https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/194

Abstract

Current few-shot segmentation (FSS) approaches have made tremendous achievements based on prototypical learning techniques. However, due to the scarcity of the support data provided, FSS methods still suffer from the intra-class and inter-class gaps. In this paper, we propose a uniform network to fill both the gaps, termed FGNet. It consists of the novel design of a Self-Adaptive Module (SAM) to emphasize the query feature to generate an enhanced prototype for self-alignment. Such a prototype caters to each query sample itself since it contains the underlying intra-instance information, which gets around the intra-class appearance gap. Moreover, we design an Inter-class Feature Separation Module (IFSM) to separate the feature space of the target class from other classes, which contributes to bridging the inter-class gap. In addition, we present several new losses and a method termed B-SLIC, which help to further enhance the separation performance of FGNet. Experimental results show that FGNet reduces both the gaps for FSS by SAM and IFSM respectively, and achieves state-of-the-art performances on both PASCAL-5i and COCO-20i datasets compared with previous top-performing approaches.

  1. 1-shot 5-shot Method split-0 split-1 split-2 split-3 mean split-0 split-1 split-2 split-3 mean PPNet [Liu et al., 2020] 52.7 62.8 57.4 47.7 55.2 60.3 70.0 69.4 60.7 65.1 PFENet [Tian et al., 2020] 60.5 69.4 54.4 55.9 60.1 62.8 70.4 54.9 57.6 61.4 ASGNet [Li et al., 2021] 59.8 67.4 55.6 54.4 59.3 64.6 71.3 64.2 57.3 64.4 MLC [Yang et al., 2021] 60.8 71.3 61.5 56.9 62.6 65.8 74.9 71.4 63.1 68.8 HSNet [Min et al., 2021] 67.3 72.3 62.0 63.1 66.2 71.8 74.4 67.0 68.3 70.4 SSP [Fan et al., 2022] 63.7 70.1 66.7 55.4 64.0 70.3 76.3 77.8 65.5 72.5 IPRNet [Okazawa, 2022] 67.8 74.6 65.7 62.2 67.5 70.0 75.9 71.8 65.8 70.9 FGNet (Ours) 69.4 73.8 68.3 62.8 68.6 72.8 75.7 79.4 65.3 73.3 Table 1: Performance on PASCAL-5 i in MIoU with per-split results under 1-shot and 5-shot settings, using the backbone of ResNet-101. The best and second-best results are in bold and underlined, respectively. 1-shot 5-shot Method split-0 split-1 split-2 split-3 mean split-0 split-1 split-2 split-3 mean PFENet [Tian et al., 2020] 34.3 33.0 32.3 30.1 32.4 38.5 38.6 38.2 34.3 27.4 MLC [Yang et al., 2021] 51.1 38.7 28.5 31.6 37.5 57.8 47.1 37.8 37.6 45.1 HSNet [Min et al., 2021] 37.2 44.1 42.4 41.3 41.2 45.9 53.0 51.8 47.1 49.5 SSP [Fan et al., 2022] 39.1 45.1 42.7 41.2 42.0 47.4 54.5 50.4 49.6 50.2 IPRNet [Okazawa, 2022] 42.9 50.6 46.8 47.4 46.9 50.7 58.3 52.8 51.3 53.3 FGNet (Ours) 44.2 51.9 49.4 47.0 48.1 49.8 58.8 55.6 52.3 54.1
  2. [Achanta et al., 2012] Radhakrishna Achanta, Appu Shaji, Kevin Smith, Aurelien Lucchi, Pascal Fua, and Sabine Süsstrunk. Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. TPAMI, 34(11):2274-2282, 2012.
  3. [Badrinarayanan et al., 2017] Vijay Badrinarayanan, Alex Kendall, and Roberto Cipolla. Segnet: A deep convolu- tional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmenta- tion. TPAMI, 39(12):2481-2495, 2017.
  4. [Baik et al., 2021] Sungyong Baik, Janghoon Choi, Heewon Kim, Dohee Cho, Jaesik Min, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Meta-learning with task-adaptive loss function for few- shot learning. In ICCV, pages 9465-9474, 2021.
  5. [Chen et al., 2017] Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Iasonas Kokkinos, Kevin Murphy, and Alan L Yuille. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convo- lutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. TPAMI, 40(4):834-848, 2017.
  6. [Chen et al., 2018] Liang-Chieh Chen, Yukun Zhu, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for se- mantic image segmentation. In ECCV, pages 801-818, 2018.
  7. [Chen et al., 2022] Haoxing Chen, Huaxiong Li, Yaohui Li, and Chunlin Chen. Multi-level metric learning for few- shot image recognition. In ICANN, pages 243-254. Springer, 2022.
  8. [Cordts et al., 2016] Marius Cordts, Mohamed Omran, Se- bastian Ramos, Timo Rehfeld, Markus Enzweiler, Rodrigo Benenson, Uwe Franke, Stefan Roth, and Bernt Schiele. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene under- standing. In CVPR, pages 3213-3223, 2016.
  9. [Deng et al., 2009] Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li- Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR, pages 248-255.
  10. [Ding et al., 2021] Nan Ding, Xi Chen, Tomer Levinboim, Sebastian Goodman, and Radu Soricut. Bridging the gap between practice and pac-bayes theory in few-shot meta- learning. NeurIPS, 34:29506-29516, 2021.
  11. [Doersch et al., 2020] Carl Doersch, Ankush Gupta, and An- drew Zisserman. Crosstransformers: spatially-aware few- shot transfer. NeurIPS, 33:21981-21993, 2020.
  12. [Dong and Xing, 2018] Nanqing Dong and Eric P Xing. Few-shot semantic segmentation with prototype learning. In BMVC, volume 3, 2018.
  13. [Dong et al., 2021] Kaiqi Dong, Wei Yang, Zhenbo Xu, Liusheng Huang, and Zhidong Yu. Abpnet: Adaptive background modeling for generalized few shot segmenta- tion. In ACM MM, pages 2271-2280, 2021.
  14. [Everingham et al., 2010] Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher KI Williams, John Winn, and Andrew Zis- serman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. IJCV, 88(2):303-338, 2010.
  15. [Fan et al., 2022] Qi Fan, Wenjie Pei, Yu-Wing Tai, and Chi- Keung Tang. Self-support few-shot semantic segmenta- tion. In ECCV, pages 701-719. Springer, 2022.
  16. [Hariharan et al., 2014] Bharath Hariharan, Pablo Arbeláez, Ross Girshick, and Jitendra Malik. Simultaneous detection and segmentation. In ECCV, pages 297-312. Springer, 2014.
  17. [He et al., 2016] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recog- nition. In CVPR, pages 770-778, 2016.
  18. [Irving, 2016] Benjamin Irving. maskslic: Regional su- perpixel generation with application to local pathol- ogy characterisation in medical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09518v2, 2016.
  19. [LeCun et al., 1989] Yann LeCun, Bernhard Boser, John S Denker, Donnie Henderson, Richard E Howard, Wayne Hubbard, and Lawrence D Jackel. Backpropagation ap- plied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural compu- tation, 1(4):541-551, 1989.
  20. [Li et al., 2021] Gen Li, Varun Jampani, Laura Sevilla-Lara, Deqing Sun, Jonghyun Kim, and Joongkyu Kim. Adaptive prototype learning and allocation for few-shot segmenta- tion. In CVPR, pages 8334-8343, 2021.
  21. [Lin et al., 2014] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Be- longie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Pi- otr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV, pages 740-755. Springer, 2014.
  22. [Liu and Qin, 2020] Jinlu Liu and Yongqiang Qin. Proto- type refinement network for few-shot segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.03579, 2020.
  23. [Liu et al., 2020] Yongfei Liu, Xiangyi Zhang, Songyang Zhang, and Xuming He. Part-aware prototype network for few-shot semantic segmentation. In ECCV, pages 142- 158. Springer, 2020.
  24. [Liu et al., 2022] Jie Liu, Yanqi Bao, Guo-Sen Xie, Huan Xiong, Jan-Jakob Sonke, and Efstratios Gavves. Dynamic prototype convolution network for few-shot semantic seg- mentation. In CVPR, pages 11553-11562, 2022.
  25. [Long et al., 2015] Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, and Trevor Darrell. Fully convolutional networks for seman- tic segmentation. In CVPR, pages 3431-3440, 2015.
  26. [Mehta et al., 2018] Sachin Mehta, Mohammad Rastegari, Anat Caspi, Linda Shapiro, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Es- pnet: Efficient spatial pyramid of dilated convolutions for semantic segmentation. In ECCV, pages 552-568, 2018.
  27. [Min et al., 2021] Juhong Min, Dahyun Kang, and Minsu Cho. Hypercorrelation squeeze for few-shot segmentation. In ICCV, pages 6941-6952, 2021.
  28. [Nguyen and Todorovic, 2019] Khoi Nguyen and Sinisa Todorovic. Feature weighting and boosting for few-shot segmentation. In ICCV, pages 622-631, 2019.
  29. [Okazawa, 2022] Atsuro Okazawa. Interclass prototype rela- tion for few-shot segmentation. In ECCV, pages 362-378. Springer, 2022.
  30. [Shaban et al., 2017] Amirreza Shaban, Shray Bansal, Zhen Liu, Irfan Essa, and Byron Boots. One-shot learning for semantic segmentation. In BMVC, 2017.
  31. [Siam et al., 2021] Mennatullah Siam, Naren Doraiswamy, Boris N Oreshkin, Hengshuai Yao, and Martin Jagersand. Weakly supervised few-shot object segmentation using co- attention with visual and semantic embeddings. In IJCAI, pages 860-867, 2021.
  32. [Silberman et al., 2012] Nathan Silberman, Derek Hoiem, Pushmeet Kohli, and Rob Fergus. Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images. In ECCV, pages 746-760. Springer, 2012.
  33. [Strudel et al., 2021] Robin Strudel, Ricardo Garcia, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation. In ICCV, pages 7262-7272, 2021.
  34. [Szegedy et al., 2017] Christian Szegedy, Sergey Ioffe, Vin- cent Vanhoucke, and Alexander A Alemi. Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In AAAI, 2017.
  35. [Tang et al., 2021] Hao Tang, Xingwei Liu, Shanlin Sun, Xi- angyi Yan, and Xiaohui Xie. Recurrent mask refinement for few-shot medical image segmentation. In CVPR, pages 3918-3928, 2021.
  36. [Tian et al., 2020] Zhuotao Tian, Hengshuang Zhao, Michelle Shu, Zhicheng Yang, Ruiyu Li, and Jiaya Jia. Prior guided feature enrichment network for few-shot segmentation. TPAMI, 2020.
  37. [Van der Maaten and Hinton, 2008] Laurens Van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. JMLR, 9(11), 2008.
  38. [Wang et al., 2019] Kaixin Wang, Jun Hao Liew, Yingtian Zou, Daquan Zhou, and Jiashi Feng. Panet: Few-shot im- age semantic segmentation with prototype alignment. In ICCV, pages 9197-9206, 2019.
  39. [Wang et al., 2020] Haochen Wang, Xudong Zhang, Yutao Hu, Yandan Yang, Xianbin Cao, and Xiantong Zhen. Few- shot semantic segmentation with democratic attention net- works. In ECCV, pages 730-746. Springer, 2020.
  40. [Wu et al., 2021] Zhonghua Wu, Xiangxi Shi, Guosheng Lin, and Jianfei Cai. Learning meta-class memory for few-shot semantic segmentation. In ICCV, pages 517-526, 2021.
  41. [Xie et al., 2021a] Enze Xie, Wenhai Wang, Zhiding Yu, An- ima Anandkumar, Jose M Alvarez, and Ping Luo. Seg- former: Simple and efficient design for semantic seg- mentation with transformers. NeurIPS, 34:12077-12090, 2021.
  42. [Xie et al., 2021b] Guo-Sen Xie, Huan Xiong, Jie Liu, Yazhou Yao, and Ling Shao. Few-shot semantic segmen- tation with cyclic memory network. In ICCV, pages 7293- 7302, 2021.
  43. [Xu et al., 2021] Hui Xu, Jiaxing Wang, Hao Li, Deqiang Ouyang, and Jie Shao. Unsupervised meta-learning for few-shot learning. PR, 116:107951, 2021.
  44. [Yang et al., 2020] Boyu Yang, Chang Liu, Bohao Li, Jian- bin Jiao, and Qixiang Ye. Prototype mixture models for few-shot semantic segmentation. In ECCV, pages 763- 778. Springer, 2020.
  45. [Yang et al., 2021] Lihe Yang, Wei Zhuo, Lei Qi, Yinghuan Shi, and Yang Gao. Mining latent classes for few-shot segmentation. In ICCV, pages 8721-8730, 2021.
  46. [Yu et al., 2020] Changqian Yu, Jingbo Wang, Changxin Gao, Gang Yu, Chunhua Shen, and Nong Sang. Con- text prior for scene segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12416-12425, 2020.
  47. [Zhou et al., 2017] Bolei Zhou, Hang Zhao, Xavier Puig, Sanja Fidler, Adela Barriuso, and Antonio Torralba. Scene parsing through ade20k dataset. In CVPR, pages 633-641, 2017.
  48. [Zhuge and Shen, 2021] Yunzhi Zhuge and Chunhua Shen. Deep reasoning network for few-shot semantic segmenta- tion. In ACM MM, pages 5344-5352, 2021.

References were extracted automatically from the PDF and may contain errors.

Welcome Future Conferences AI Journal Division IJCAI Proceedings About IJCAI IJCAI Awards